Factors Affecting the Energy Delivered to Simulated Class I and Class V Preparations(2)
Studies establishing the relationship between energy density received and qualities of the resultant resin curing have typically utilized ideal laboratory conditions, whereby the light curing unit was fixed at 90° directly above the resin, maximizing exposure of the restoration to the beam and minimizing the amount of light scattering at the surface.3,5-11,13 However, in a clinical environment, there are substantial deviations from this ideal configuration, and the clinician may have difficulty achieving or consistently maintaining the orientation of the light guide end at 90° with respect to the restoration. Under these clinical conditions, it is unlikely that experimentally determined exposure times will deliver the intended total dose of light energy. Furthermore, operator error may cause the curing light to shift in position relative to the restoration. This could reduce the actual time that the resin is exposed to the light and the energy delivered to the restoration.
Many studies of the effects of different light curing units on resin polymerization have used hand-held dental curing radiometers to measure irradiance,18-21 but other work has shown that these instruments are inaccurate.22,23 In addition, these meters report only the irradiance at the tip-end of the curing light; they do not report the irradiance or energy actually received by the resin restora
Next: Promising Directions for Caries Prevention with American Indian and Alaska Native Children
- Long Island College Hospital - [education]
- Faculty of Dental Medicine - H [education]
- The American Association of Or [organize]
- Summer Institute in Clinical D [organize]
- Academy of Osseointegration [organize]
- University of North Carolina a [education]
- American Orthodontic Society [article]
- American Equilibration Society [article]
- Niigata University - Japan [education]
- University of Buffalo [education]